Wikipedia blacklists Archive.today after alleged DDoS attack

Summary

Wikipedia editors blacklisted Archive.today due to concerns about DDoS attacks and content alteration. The decision followed discussions and allegations of malicious activity targeting a blogger.

Key Takeaways

1. Wikipedia editors blacklisted Archive.today due to concerns about DDoS attacks and content alteration.
2. Archive.today was previously blacklisted in 2013, only to be removed from the blacklist in 2016.
3. The owner of Archive.today stated that the site's value to Wikipedia was about copyright issues, not paywalls, and indicated they would scale down the 'DDoS'.

Statement Breakdown

• Claimed Facts: 60% of statements the article presents as facts
• Opinions: 25% of statements classified as editorial or subjective
• Claims: 15% of statements surfaced for additional reader evaluation

Credibility & Bias Reasoning

Credibility assessment: The article relies on direct quotes from Wikipedia discussion pages and a blogger's account, providing some transparency. However, the claims of DDoS attacks and altered content are based on allegations and circumstantial evidence. The article could benefit from more independent verification of these claims.

Bias assessment: Neutral Reporting with Focus on Tech Community Concerns. The article presents the issue from the perspective of Wikipedia editors and a blogger who was allegedly targeted by Archive.today. While it includes a statement from the Archive.today owner, the overall framing emphasizes the concerns about reliability and potential malicious activity. The article doesn't appear to have a strong political or ideological bias.

Note: This article presents allegations and claims that require independent verification. Exercise caution when interpreting the information.

Credibility flag: Verify Claims

Claimed Facts (6)

• This is a verifiable action taken by Wikipedia editors.
• This describes the function of Archive.today.
• This is a statement of historical fact based on Wikipedia's records.
• This is a statement of an alleged event.
• This is a direct quote from Patokallio's account.
• This describes Wikipedia's current policy.

Opinions (5)

• This is an assumption about the primary use of the website.
• This is an opinion on the usefulness of the website.
• This is the webmaster's opinion on the media.
• This is Patokallio's conclusion based on his investigation.
• This is the owner's opinion on the value of the website.

Claims (6)

• This is a serious accusation without definitive proof in the article.
• The evidence is not presented in the article, making this a dubious claim.
• This is a subjective characterization of the webmaster's behavior.
• The alteration is only 'apparent' and not definitively proven.
• The use of quotes around 'DDoS' suggests skepticism about whether it was a real attack.
• This is a dismissive statement with no evidence.

Key Sources

• Anthony Ha — Author
• Wikipedia discussion page — Wikipedia
• Jani Patokallio — Blogger
• Archive.today webmaster — Archive.today
• Archive.today owner — Archive.today