Andrew Walworth argues against labeling the assailant's writings as a 'manifesto,' describing it as roughly a thousand words of nonsensical content. He suggests that calling it a manifesto gives it undue credit and that it lacks the coherence of actual manifestos like the Communist Manifesto.

Impact: Medium. By downplaying the document's significance, Walworth attempts to detach the act from any coherent political ideology, framing it as the work of an isolated individual rather than a product of specific political movements.

In the source video, this keypoint occurs from 01:18:23 to 01:19:21.