Jason Bordoff and Meghan L. O’Sullivan: The Iran Shock Is Not Over | Foreign Affairs Interview
Bypassing Hormuz: The First Buffer
A key factor in mitigating the impact of the Strait of Hormuz closure was the existence of bypass pipelines, primarily in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. These pipelines allowed a significant portion of oil, estimated between 25-30% of the 20 million barrels per day that typically transit Hormuz, to be rerouted to alternative ports like the Red Sea. While these pipelines were built decades ago and already carried some oil, Saudi Arabia and the UAE were able to maximize their capacity to move approximately 7 million barrels of oil per day. This existing infrastructure provided a crucial, albeit limited, alternative route, preventing a complete shutdown of supply from the region.
China's Demand Modulation: A Strategic Implication?
China's decision to significantly reduce its oil imports, particularly by halting the filling of its strategic reserves and curtailing refinery runs due to high prices, had a substantial impact on global markets. This move effectively removed approximately 5 million barrels of demand per day, acting as a crucial demand-side buffer. While potentially driven by China's economic self-interest, this action had the unintended consequence of helping to stabilize global prices. This demonstrates a new possibility: demand modulation as a tool alongside supply management in future energy shocks, potentially offering China a new foreign policy lever, especially in scenarios like a Taiwan contingency.
US Sanctions Strategy: A Need for Cohesion
The current US policy towards Iran, particularly regarding sanctions, lacks a clear strategic alignment between tools and objectives. While various tools are employed, it's unclear how they are integrated to achieve specific goals like regime change, behavior change, or containment. For effective economic pressure to yield strategic gains, distinct strategies are required for each objective. The most viable option for the Trump administration, from a sanctions perspective, appears to be a containment strategy that marshals military support for economic sanctions aimed at isolating Iran until internal change or a negotiated solution becomes possible.
Bordoff: Clean Energy Boost Amidst Caveats
While energy security concerns may boost clean energy adoption like EVs and solar, countries will also invest more in oil and gas resilience. The relative manageability of recent oil price shocks might lead to a perception that the oil and gas system is resilient, encouraging further investment in its infrastructure. Furthermore, dependence on China for clean energy supply chains presents a new geopolitical risk.
Bordoff: The Return of the Energy Weapon
The 'energy weapon' is being deployed globally, seen in China's restrictions on critical mineral exports and Iran's actions in the Strait of Hormuz. The US has also used energy as a tool through sanctions and blockades, as with Venezuela and Cuba. Russia's cutoff of gas to Europe exemplifies this trend, underscoring the need for diversification in energy sources, supply chains, and technologies to build resilience.
O'Sullivan: Venezuela Deal's Colonial Echoes
The recent US deal involving an equity stake in Venezuelan oil is extraordinary and reminiscent of colonialism, generating political backlash and potentially undermining prospects for stability. This deal, involving a less prominent company, raises concerns about its durability and whether it truly serves the interests of a democratic transition, contrasting with the need for stabilization and private capital attraction.
Bordoff: Ukraine's Strikes on Russian Oil
Ukrainian strikes on Russia's oil industry are having a tangible economic impact, evidenced by long lines for refined products and Russian restrictions on exports. While these actions demonstrate impact, their ultimate effectiveness in altering Putin's decision-making in Ukraine remains to be seen, distinguishing between causing economic pain and forcing strategic concessions.






