The Army just used a 20-kilowatt laser to take out three drones
The Army says its laser system can track and destroy hostile drones.
- 1. The US Army used a 20-kilowatt laser system to shoot down three drones near the US-Mexico border, citing a physical threat to personnel and partners.
- 2. The Locust Laser Weapon System, developed by AeroVironment, is designed to be mounted on military vehicles and uses a concentrated beam of light to damage or destroy targets at a distance.
- 3. Commander Curtis Taylor suggested the drones could be linked to criminal cells involved in drug trafficking and operations in Mexican territory, and that "Cartel networks are increasingly employing unmanned aircraft systems to facilitate illicit human smuggling and actively spy on our personnel and law enforcement partners."
Article analysis
Skim this article about "The Army just used a 20-kilowatt laser to take out three drones": 3 key takeaways and more.
The Army just used a 20-kilowatt laser to take out three drones
skim AI Analysis | Ars Technica
Ars Technica on The Army just used a 20-kilowatt laser to take out three drones: skim's analysis surfaces 3 key takeaways. The US Army used a 20-kilowatt laser system to destroy three drones near the US-Mexico border, citing a physical threat. Read the takeaways in seconds, then decide whether the full article is worth your time.
Category: Current Events. News article analyzed by skim.
Summary
The US Army used a 20-kilowatt laser system to destroy three drones near the US-Mexico border, citing a physical threat. The system, developed by AeroVironment, can detect, track, and destroy targets. Officials linked the drones to criminal cells involved in drug trafficking and smuggling.
Key Takeaways
- The US Army used a 20-kilowatt laser system to shoot down three drones near the US-Mexico border, citing a physical threat to personnel and partners.
- The Locust Laser Weapon System, developed by AeroVironment, is designed to be mounted on military vehicles and uses a concentrated beam of light to damage or destroy targets at a distance.
- Commander Curtis Taylor suggested the drones could be linked to criminal cells involved in drug trafficking and operations in Mexican territory, and that "Cartel networks are increasingly employing unmanned aircraft systems to facilitate illicit human smuggling and actively spy on our personnel and law enforcement partners."
Statement Breakdown
- Claimed Facts: 60% of statements the article presents as facts
- Opinions: 30% of statements classified as editorial or subjective
- Claims: 10% of statements surfaced for additional reader evaluation
Credibility & Bias Reasoning
Credibility assessment: The article relies on official statements and manufacturer information regarding the laser system's capabilities. However, it acknowledges a lack of concrete information on the drones' origin and responsible parties, and links the event to a political campaign without direct evidence from the operation itself.
Bias assessment: Border Security Focus. The article frames the drone incident through the lens of border security and combating criminal activity. It highlights official statements emphasizing threats to personnel and partners, and connects the event to a political agenda focused on border control.
Note: This article presents official claims about a military operation and its technological capabilities. Be aware of potential political framing and the lack of independent verification for certain aspects of the event.
Credibility flag: Official Statements, Political Links
Claimed Facts (6)
- This is a direct report of an event and official claims made about it.
- This provides specific details about the time, location, and command structure of the operation.
- This states the confirmed technology used in the operation.
- This provides a timeline and details about the development and delivery of the technology.
- This describes the operational capabilities of the laser system.
- This explains the general method used by such systems for target acquisition.
Opinions (3)
- The use of 'suggested' indicates this is an interpretation or hypothesis rather than a confirmed fact.
- This statement attributes a link to the 'international press,' indicating it's a reported association rather than a direct finding of the article.
- This refers to campaign promises, which are statements of intent and not necessarily factual outcomes.
Claims (2)
- This highlights a lack of specific information, which could be due to security reasons or incomplete reporting, making it a point of uncertainty.
- This explicitly states a lack of concrete information, raising questions about the completeness of the reported event.
Key Sources
- WIRED — Media
- Curtis Taylor — Commander of JTF-SB
- AeroVironment — Defense Technology Company
- US Army — Military Branch
- US Northern Command — Military Command
- Joint Task Force Southern Border (JTF-SB) — Military Task Force
- Donald Trump — Former President
This analysis was generated by skim (skim.plus), an AI-powered content analysis platform by Credible AI. Scores and classifications represent the platform's AI-generated assessment and should be considered alongside other sources.
skim analyzes recent Ars Technica coverage for what holds up, what reads as opinion, and what may not be fully supported. Last updated 2nd September 2026.