The $200,000 LEGO Scandal
BAM's Defense: 'Not Our Deal'
BAM Franchising argues they are not legally responsible for the Mansell LEGO collection because they were not a party to the original consignment agreement signed between Mansell and Gorman. They contend that consignment deals were against franchise guidelines and that Gorman was responsible for any losses while the collection was under her control.
BAM's Lawsuit Against Reckless Ben
BAM Franchising filed a lawsuit against Reckless Ben, accusing him of fraud and extortion by allegedly tricking a store manager into signing a document that granted him access and imposed penalties for police involvement. BAM sought a restraining order to remove Ben's videos, framing his actions as harassment.
Multiple Legal Battles Ensue
The situation has spawned at least four distinct legal conflicts: an open criminal investigation in Oregon regarding theft, BAM's lawsuit against Ben in Utah, Ben's criminal case in Utah, and Crystal Law Gorman's lawsuit against BAM. Each fight carries its own implications for the central dispute over the LEGOs.
