The 9 best headphones and earbuds for working out in 2025
We put the best headphones for working out to the test, including the new Apple AirPods Pro 3. Check out the top sports earbuds and bone conduction headphones.
- 1. The Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 are a strong choice for fitness users within the Apple ecosystem due to their engaging sound, durability, and convenient controls.
- 2. The Apple AirPods Pro 3 offer excellent noise cancellation, heart-rate monitoring, and easy connectivity for iOS users, making them ideal for workouts in noisy environments.
- 3. Workout headphones should be wireless and sweat- or water-resistant to withstand movement and moisture during exercise.
Article analysis
Skim this article about "The 9 best headphones and earbuds for working out in 2025": 3 key takeaways and more.
The 9 best headphones and earbuds for working out in 2025
skim AI Analysis | Mashable
Mashable on The 9 best headphones and earbuds for working out in 2025: skim's analysis surfaces 3 key takeaways. The article reviews the best headphones and earbuds for working out in 2025, highlighting the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 and Apple AirPods Pro 3. Read the takeaways in seconds, then decide whether the full article is worth your time.
Category: Technology. News article analyzed by skim.
Summary
The article reviews the best headphones and earbuds for working out in 2025, highlighting the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 and Apple AirPods Pro 3. It focuses on features like sweat resistance, noise cancellation, and connectivity.
Key Takeaways
- The Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 are a strong choice for fitness users within the Apple ecosystem due to their engaging sound, durability, and convenient controls.
- The Apple AirPods Pro 3 offer excellent noise cancellation, heart-rate monitoring, and easy connectivity for iOS users, making them ideal for workouts in noisy environments.
- Workout headphones should be wireless and sweat- or water-resistant to withstand movement and moisture during exercise.
Statement Breakdown
- Claimed Facts: 60% of statements the article presents as facts
- Opinions: 30% of statements classified as editorial or subjective
- Claims: 10% of statements surfaced for additional reader evaluation
Credibility & Bias Reasoning
Credibility assessment: The article presents itself as a product review based on testing. The authors have experience in tech and product reviewing, increasing credibility. However, the presence of subjective opinions and promotional elements lowers the overall score.
Bias assessment: Consumer-focused with Apple ecosystem preference. The article leans towards recommending products that integrate well with the Apple ecosystem, particularly AirPods and Beats. There's a clear focus on features beneficial to iOS users, suggesting a bias towards Apple products. The language used is also promotional, aiming to drive consumer purchases.
Note: This article contains product recommendations and subjective opinions. Evaluate the claims and consider your own needs before making a purchase.
Credibility flag: Considered Recommendations
Claimed Facts (7)
- This is a specific, testable claim about battery life.
- This is a specific claim about the charging case capabilities.
- This is a verifiable specification about the AirPods Pro 3.
- This is a specific claim about battery life with ANC enabled.
- This is a factual statement about the features of the headphones.
- This is a specification about battery life.
- This is a specification about ear tip sizes.
Opinions (6)
- This is a subjective assessment of sound quality.
- This is a subjective description of the headtracking feature.
- This is a subjective opinion on the design.
- This is a subjective assessment of sound and noise cancellation performance.
- This is a subjective recommendation based on brand loyalty.
- This is a subjective opinion on the sound quality.
Claims (5)
- This is a vague and unsubstantiated claim about the health features.
- This statement acknowledges inaccuracy but still suggests serviceability, which is a weak endorsement.
- This is a series of unsubstantiated claims presented without evidence.
- This is an exaggerated claim without specific evidence.
- This is a vague and unsubstantiated claim.
Key Sources
- Samantha Mangino — Shopping Reporter at Mashable
- Alex Bracetti — Freelance reviewer
- Apple — Technology company
- Beats — Audio products company
This analysis was generated by skim (skim.plus), an AI-powered content analysis platform by Credible AI. Scores and classifications represent the platform's AI-generated assessment and should be considered alongside other sources.
skim analyzes recent Mashable coverage for what holds up, what reads as opinion, and what may not be fully supported. Last updated 18th March 2026.