10 Times Megyn Kelly EXPOSED Dr. Fauci For the Dangerous Fraud He Is

1. Megyn Kelly: The Mask Mandate Deception

Timestamp: 00:00:05 to 00:05:04 - watch this moment on skim

Masks, particularly cloth masks, were largely ineffective against airborne transmission of COVID-19, a fact that public health officials like Dr. Fauci allegedly downplayed or lied about to the public. Early statements from figures like Scott Gotautle and Lyanna Wen acknowledging mask ineffectiveness were allegedly suppressed or ignored by platforms like YouTube, while Fauci himself continued to promote mask-wearing, even admitting to a 'noble lie' to conserve N95 masks for healthcare workers. This created a dangerous disconnect between scientific reality and public guidance, potentially leading to increased infections.

Significance (High): This point highlights a critical failure in public health communication, suggesting that the public was deliberately misled about the efficacy of basic protective measures, leading to potentially harmful outcomes and a significant erosion of trust in authorities.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Dr. Anthony Fauci (Former Director of NIAID), Scott Gotautle (Former FDA Commissioner), Lyanna Wen (Public Health Commentator)

2. Megyn Kelly: The Corrupted Institutions

Timestamp: 00:09:02 to 00:11:26 - watch this moment on skim

The integrity of prestigious institutions like Yale, Johns Hopkins, and MIT is questioned due to the perceived infiltration of 'woke' ideology, which allegedly corrupts the education of future doctors and lawyers. This ideological shift is seen as dangerous, potentially leading to discriminatory practices and a decline in the quality of professionals. The speaker expresses concern that future doctors might deny treatment based on race, reflecting a broader systemic corruption that mirrors that of the American media.

Significance (High): This point raises alarm bells about the foundational pillars of society—education and healthcare—suggesting they are compromised by ideological agendas, which could have far-reaching negative consequences for public trust and societal well-being.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Yale University, Johns Hopkins University, MIT, Georgetown Law

3. The 'Fauci Effect': Delusion or Deliberate Misdirection?

Timestamp: 00:11:58 to 00:16:07 - watch this moment on skim

Dr. Fauci's self-proclaimed 'Fauci Effect,' suggesting he inspires medical students through his integrity and care, is viewed as delusional and a 'humble brag.' Critics argue that Fauci is actually responsible for a collapse in trust in science and public health authorities due to his perceived lies, bad decisions, and funding of gain-of-function research. His continued position and upcoming honors are seen as infuriating and indicative of a broader corruption within institutions.

Significance (High): This point directly challenges Dr. Fauci's public image and legacy, suggesting his influence has been detrimental rather than inspirational, contributing to societal division and a crisis of confidence in scientific leadership.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Dr. Anthony Fauci (Former Director of NIAID)

4. Jared Kushner: The Bureaucratic Bottleneck

Timestamp: 00:18:30 to 00:20:57 - watch this moment on skim

During the pandemic's early stages, bureaucratic hurdles and a lack of decisive action, exemplified by Dr. Fauci's public statements, significantly hampered the rollout of critical testing. Despite innovative plans involving private companies like CVS and Walgreens, the limited availability of swabs and Fauci's vague pronouncements like 'we're just not there yet on testing' created bottlenecks. This suggests that internal White House dynamics and potential leaks to the media, possibly involving Fauci, further complicated the response.

Significance (Medium): This perspective highlights systemic failures in the pandemic response, pointing to a disconnect between on-the-ground efforts and leadership communication, which ultimately delayed crucial public health measures like widespread testing.

Sources in support: Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

Neutral sources: Dr. Anthony Fauci (Former Director of NIAID), Jim Acasta, CVS, Walgreens, Walmart

5. Megyn Kelly: The Lab Leak Lie

Timestamp: 00:21:11 to 00:22:10 - watch this moment on skim

Dr. Fauci allegedly lied under oath to Congress and to the public regarding the origins of COVID-19, specifically concerning the lab leak theory. Emails between Fauci and Dr. Collins allegedly show a concerted effort to dismiss the lab leak hypothesis as fringe conspiracy, despite internal scientific discussions suggesting it was a plausible origin. This alleged deception is presented as further evidence of Fauci's untrustworthiness and manipulation of scientific discourse.

Significance (High): This accusation strikes at the heart of the pandemic's origin narrative, suggesting a deliberate cover-up by top health officials that prevented a full and honest investigation into how the virus emerged, thereby hindering future prevention efforts.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Dr. Anthony Fauci (Former Director of NIAID), WSJ, Dr. Collins

6. Megyn Kelly: Fauci's Lab Leak Theory Dismissal

Timestamp: 00:22:13 to 00:26:37 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly argues that Dr. Fauci's dismissal of the COVID-19 lab leak theory is intellectually dishonest. She contends that intelligence agencies, including the FBI and Department of Energy, increasingly believe the virus resulted from gain-of-function research, not a natural occurrence. Fauci's insistence on a natural origin, she claims, ignores evidence of regular lab leaks and is a deliberate misrepresentation to avoid alienating Beijing.

Significance (High): This point challenges the scientific consensus and official narratives surrounding the pandemic's origin, suggesting a deliberate cover-up by public health officials to protect geopolitical interests over scientific truth.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President), Lyanna Wen (Public Health Commentator), Brett Weinstein

7. The 'Noble Lie' and Elite Corruption

Timestamp: 00:30:58 to 00:33:14 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly posits that Dr. Fauci practices the 'noble lie,' believing the public is too uneducated to handle the truth, thus justifying manipulation of information for perceived societal good. She likens this to corporate 'greenwashing' and argues Fauci's funding of gain-of-function research through EcoHealth Alliance is a form of 'hazard washing,' outsourcing dangerous work to China to profit at home while disclaiming the consequences. This elite corruption, she asserts, is characteristic of the age and deeply horrifying.

Significance (High): This framing casts public health officials not as trusted advisors but as manipulative elites engaged in self-serving corruption, fundamentally eroding trust in institutions and scientific guidance.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), Dr. Anthony Fauci (Former Director of NIAID), Scott Gotautle (Former FDA Commissioner)

Neutral sources: Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

8. Fauci's Unwavering Confidence Amidst Criticism

Timestamp: 00:33:55 to 00:36:39 - watch this moment on skim

The video highlights Dr. Fauci's persistent claim that he would do nothing differently and sleeps soundly despite the pandemic's devastation, contrasting sharply with the millions of deaths. This unwavering self-assurance, coupled with his dismissiveness towards critics like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, is portrayed as a 'god complex' and an 'appeal to authority' rather than a scientific stance.

Significance (High): Fauci's perceived lack of remorse or critical self-reflection fuels public anger and distrust, positioning him as out of touch and unaccountable for the pandemic's impact.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), NIH, Yale University

Neutral sources: Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

9. Mask Efficacy Under Scrutiny

Timestamp: 00:41:13 to 00:43:53 - watch this moment on skim

The video presents findings from a Cochrane review, cited by Brett Stevens, suggesting 'no evidence' that masks make a difference in reducing respiratory illness transmission at either individual or population levels. Dr. Fauci's response, distinguishing between individual and population effects, is characterized as a 'qualifier' and an attempt to obfuscate the review's unambiguous conclusions. The host emphasizes that the review's lead author, Tom Jefferson, found no evidence masks work.

Significance (High): This challenges the efficacy of a primary public health intervention, suggesting that mask mandates were based on flawed data or political expediency rather than robust scientific evidence, potentially leading to public distrust in health authorities.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), Dr. Fauci (Director of NIAID), Tom Jefferson (Lead author of Cochrane review), Federalist Society, WSJ

Sources against: Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

10. CDC Data Misrepresentation Alleged

Timestamp: 00:44:45 to 00:45:36 - watch this moment on skim

The host alleges that the CDC misrepresented data in a study about schools in Arizona, claiming the published statistics differed from the official data provided by the state. Despite attempts to correct the record with CDC editors and study authors, the response was that 'there are no errors,' suggesting a deliberate cover-up or misrepresentation of facts regarding the impact of policies like school closures.

Significance (High): This accusation of data manipulation by a leading public health agency severely undermines its credibility and raises questions about the scientific integrity behind policy decisions, particularly concerning children's education and well-being.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), CVS

Sources against: Dr. Collins

Neutral sources: Johns Hopkins University, Walgreens

11. Megyn Kelly: Fauci's Mask Mandate Flip-Flop

Timestamp: 00:45:38 to 00:50:22 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly argues that Dr. Fauci's shifting stance on mask mandates, from initially advising against them to later recommending them, was not based on evolving science but on a deliberate strategy to control public perception and maintain relevance, potentially to prop up political figures. She highlights his deposition where he claimed to have 'no regrets' but later admitted he would have recommended masking sooner, attributing the change to 'aerosol spread' and 'asymptomatic transmission' which she contends were known or should have been known earlier.

Significance (High): This point challenges the credibility of public health guidance and suggests a manipulative intent behind policy changes, eroding public trust in scientific authorities.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

12. Zweig: Fauci's Role in Drug Approval and Industry Ties

Timestamp: 00:54:47 to 00:56:13 - watch this moment on skim

David Zweig explains how Dr. Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) became dependent on pharmaceutical companies like GlaxoSmithKline for drug development after taking over AIDS research. He argues that this dependency, coupled with Fauci's need to develop drugs quickly, led to his permanent association with drug companies and influenced the approval process for ACT, which he claims was rushed through with questionable evidence and safety signals.

Significance (Medium): This point suggests that Dr. Fauci's career trajectory and institutional role fostered an environment where pharmaceutical interests could unduly influence public health decisions.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

13. Zweig: Manufactured Pandemics for Relevance

Timestamp: 00:56:13 to 01:00:20 - watch this moment on skim

David Zweig argues that institutions like the CDC and NIAID, facing declining relevance as infectious disease mortality decreased due to sanitation and nutrition, began to 'manufacture' pandemics. He cites alleged 'fake pandemics' like swine flu (1976, 2009), bird flu (2005), and Zika, claiming these events were used to secure funding, grant liability immunity to vaccine companies, and maintain institutional importance, with Fauci allegedly orchestrating or benefiting from these manufactured crises.

Significance (High): This assertion paints a picture of public health agencies as self-serving entities that exploit public fear for financial and political gain, fundamentally questioning their motives.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

14. Kelly & Zweig: The COVID-19 Pandemic and Censorship Lawsuit

Timestamp: 01:00:33 to 01:03:59 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly and David Zweig discuss the COVID-19 pandemic as a 'genuine pandemic' but focus on the alleged collusion between the Biden administration, CDC, and tech companies to censor information. They highlight Dr. Fauci's deposition in a lawsuit where he repeatedly claimed 'I don't recall' on critical issues, including the decision-making process behind mask mandates and the 'smearing' of scientists like those behind the Great Barrington Declaration.

Significance (High): This point suggests a coordinated effort to control the narrative around COVID-19, implying that dissenting scientific opinions were actively suppressed, and key figures like Fauci evaded accountability.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

15. Zweig: Fauci's Abuse of Power and Scientific Consensus

Timestamp: 01:03:59 to 01:05:26 - watch this moment on skim

David Zweig argues that Dr. Fauci and Francis Collins abused their power by controlling vast research funding and creating a social structure within biomedical science that punishes dissent. He claims they actively worked to discredit scientists who disagreed with their policies, labeling them 'fringe epidemiologists,' thereby silencing critical voices and creating a false illusion of scientific consensus on issues like lockdowns and COVID-19 policies.

Significance (High): This accusation frames Fauci and Collins as authoritarian figures who corrupted the scientific process to enforce a specific agenda, rather than adhering to open scientific inquiry.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

16. Zweig: Early COVID-19 Spread and Failed Suppression Strategy

Timestamp: 01:08:20 to 01:09:56 - watch this moment on skim

David Zweig criticizes the COVID-19 suppression strategy, arguing that early studies in Santa Clara and Los Angeles counties in April 2020 indicated widespread infection, contradicting the need for strict containment. He contends that Dr. Fauci was aware of this data but proceeded with a suppression strategy instead of a 'focused protection' approach, which would have protected vulnerable populations while allowing others to develop immunity, suggesting a fundamental misjudgment based on flawed scientific interpretation.

Significance (High): This point challenges the core strategy of lockdowns and mandates, proposing that alternative, less restrictive measures were viable and ignored due to flawed scientific reasoning or agenda-driven decisions.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), Jared Kushner (Former Senior Advisor to the President)

Fauci's Role in Gain-of-Function Research Funding (High severity)

Type: Financial

Dr. Fauci's involvement in funding gain-of-function research, which some believe may have led to the COVID-19 pandemic, presents a significant conflict of interest given his public statements downplaying the lab leak theory.

Significance: This raises profound questions about whether Dr. Fauci's public pronouncements were influenced by his prior financial and research entanglements, potentially compromising his objectivity and the public's trust in his guidance.

Fauci's 'Noble Lie' Strategy (High severity)

Type: Editorial

Dr. Fauci admitted to telling 'noble lies' about mask efficacy to conserve supplies for healthcare workers, suggesting a deliberate manipulation of public information.

Significance: This admission suggests a paternalistic approach to public communication, where the 'expert' decides what the public should know, eroding transparency and potentially leading to public distrust when the 'truth' eventually emerges.

Institutional Bias in Academia and Medicine (Medium severity)

Type: Reputational

The video suggests that prestigious universities and medical institutions are promoting 'woke' ideologies that compromise the quality of education and medical care, potentially leading to discriminatory practices.

Significance: If these institutions are indeed prioritizing ideology over merit and objective science, it could have long-term consequences for the competence of future doctors and legal professionals, impacting public trust and safety.

Funding Gain-of-Function Research (High severity)

Type: Financial

Dr. Fauci's NIAID funded EcoHealth Alliance, which in turn funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This creates a significant conflict as he has consistently downplayed the possibility of a lab leak originating from this research, despite evidence suggesting otherwise.

Significance: This financial tie raises serious questions about whether Dr. Fauci's public statements and defense of the Wuhan lab were influenced by his agency's funding, potentially compromising his objectivity in assessing the pandemic's origins and public health risks.

Shifting Public Health Messaging (Medium severity)

Type: Professional

Dr. Fauci's messaging on masks, herd immunity thresholds, and vaccine effectiveness evolved significantly over time, often contradicting earlier statements. This inconsistency is presented as a professional failing that erodes public trust.

Significance: The shifting guidance, particularly regarding mask mandates and the perceived effectiveness of vaccines versus natural immunity, has led to public confusion and skepticism, undermining the credibility of public health institutions and potentially impacting compliance with future recommendations.

Fauci's Past Handling of AIDS Drug ACT (High severity)

Type: Professional

Dr. Fauci's alleged promotion of the highly toxic drug ACT during the AIDS epidemic, despite its severe side effects and questionable efficacy, is presented as evidence of a pattern of prioritizing specific treatments over patient well-being or alternative therapies.

Significance: This historical parallel is used to cast doubt on Dr. Fauci's judgment and motives regarding COVID-19 vaccines, suggesting a potential bias towards pharmaceutical solutions regardless of their risks or the availability of other treatments.

Alleged Collusion to Censor COVID-19 Information (High severity)

Type: Editorial

The lawsuit alleges that the Biden administration, in coordination with tech companies like Twitter, actively worked to suppress dissenting views on COVID-19, including those from scientists associated with the Great Barrington Declaration.

Significance: This raises serious questions about the integrity of public health discourse and the suppression of scientific debate, suggesting that official narratives were enforced through censorship rather than open scientific exchange.

Fauci's Role in Drug Development and Funding (Medium severity)

Type: Financial

Dr. Fauci's long-standing reliance on and collaboration with pharmaceutical companies like GlaxoSmithKline for drug development, particularly during the AIDS crisis, is highlighted as a potential conflict of interest.

Significance: This history suggests a potential predisposition to favor pharmaceutical interventions and partnerships, which critics argue may have influenced his recommendations and priorities during the COVID-19 pandemic.