Here Are the Five Biggest Snowstorms in New York City Since 1869

Summary

The article details the five biggest snowstorms in New York City since 1869, according to the National Weather Service. It highlights the snowfall amounts, impacts, and historical context of each storm.

Key Takeaways

1. New York City is bracing for a winter storm expected to bring 12 to 20 inches of snow and strong winds, prompting the first blizzard warning since 2017.
2. The Blizzard of '06 dumped 26.9 inches of snow in Central Park, with snowfall rates reaching 3 to 5 inches per hour.
3. The Blizzard of '88 paralyzed the region with 21 inches of snow and winds of 85 m.p.h., disrupting travel and communication.

Statement Breakdown

• Claimed Facts: 75% of statements the article presents as facts
• Opinions: 15% of statements classified as editorial or subjective
• Claims: 10% of statements surfaced for additional reader evaluation

Credibility & Bias Reasoning

Credibility assessment: The article primarily relies on data from the National Weather Service and historical records, enhancing its factual basis. Quotes from credible sources like the U.S. Weather Bureau and its chief meteorologist further support the information presented. The article avoids sensationalism and focuses on verifiable weather events and their impacts.

Bias assessment: Informative Historical Account. The article presents historical weather events with minimal subjective interpretation. It focuses on factual reporting of snowstorm details and their impacts, rather than advocating for a particular viewpoint. The narrative is largely descriptive and avoids emotionally charged language.

Note: This article presents historical weather data and events. While generally factual, interpretations of impact may vary.

Credibility flag: Fact-based History

Claimed Facts (7)

• This is a verifiable weather event.
• This is a factual statement based on official weather alerts.
• This is a specific measurement of snowfall.
• This provides specific snowfall data.
• This is a specific measurement of snowfall.
• This is a reported economic impact from a credible source.
• This is a specific measurement of snowfall.

Opinions (4)

• The description of the storm as "powerful" and the winds as "blistering" is subjective.
• The description of "near-blizzard conditions" is somewhat subjective.
• This is a subjective assessment of the weather forecast's accuracy.
• The term "fabulous sums" is subjective.

Claims (5)

• While possible, this statement lacks specific attribution or data to verify the claim of "pummeled".
• While tragic, the direct cause of death being "attempting to drive on icy highways or shovel snow in the winds" is a generalization without specific evidence.
• While potentially true, the direct causal link between the storm and Biden's travel plans is not explicitly proven and could be an exaggeration.
• The statement implies a technicality without fully explaining the nuances of blizzard classification.
• The claim of "little food" is vague and lacks specific evidence.

Key Sources

• Author — Author
• Weather Service — Official Weather Authority
• Benjamin Parry — chief meteorologist of New York’s Weather Bureau